Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
specjalność: Property Valuation and Real Estate Transactions

Sylabus przedmiotu Analysis and Planning Methods:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Analysis and Planning Methods
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Zastosowań Matematyki w Ekonomii
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Henryk Marjak <Henryk.Marjak@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane) 3,0 ECTS (formy) 3,0
Forma zaliczenia egzamin Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
wykładyW5 15 1,00,50egzamin
ćwiczenia audytoryjneA5 25 2,00,50zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1The student should know the basics of microeconomics and the basics of business management

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Familiarize students with the methods of supporting decision-making processes and the ability to use them
C-2Shaping the ability to choose a particular analysis method depending on the conditions

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
ćwiczenia audytoryjne
T-A-1Basic principles of analysis and planning. Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk.2
T-A-2Decision making under uncertainty2
T-A-3Decision making under risk2
T-A-4Written test2
T-A-5Network Programming - problem solving CPM methods.2
T-A-6PERT methods2
T-A-7Time and cost analysis2
T-A-8Written test2
T-A-9Inventory models2
T-A-10Queuing systems2
T-A-11Models of renewal2
T-A-12Written test2
T-A-13AHP method1
25
wykłady
T-W-1Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk2
T-W-2Solving problems with the use of network programming4
T-W-3Analytical models of queuing systems2
T-W-4Analysis of inventory problems2
T-W-5Transport problem2
T-W-6Methods of multi-criteria planning3
15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
ćwiczenia audytoryjne
A-A-1Preparing for exercises10
A-A-2Preparing for the test of exercises15
A-A-3Participation in classes25
50
wykłady
A-W-1Participation in lectures15
A-W-2Getting to know the literature of the subject4
A-W-3Preparing to pass a written4
A-W-4Exam2
25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Method of giving / Information lecture
M-2Method problem / Problem lecture
M-3Activation method / Case method
M-4Practical method / Auditory exercises

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from lectures in the form of test
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from practice: tasks to be solved
S-3Ocena formująca: Rating activity participation in student activities, involving the preparation of a topic discussed in class

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_C16_W01
The student has knowledge about methods supporting the process of making managerial decisions
Ec_1A_W07, Ec_1A_W12C-1T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6M-1, M-2S-1
Ec_1A_C16_W02
Student is able to characterize the assumptions of methods supporting the decision-making process
Ec_1A_W01, Ec_1A_W06C-1T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5M-1, M-2S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_C16_U01
The student analyzes the causes of the course of economic phenomena and their impact on the decisions made
Ec_1A_U08C-2T-A-9, T-A-10, T-A-11, T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7M-4, M-3S-2
Ec_1A_C16_U02
The student has the ability to use theoretical knowledge in the decision making process
Ec_1A_U02C-2T-A-9, T-A-10, T-A-11, T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7M-4, M-3S-2, S-3
Ec_1A_C16_U03
The student has the ability to select and use the appropriate method depending on the situation
Ec_1A_U04, Ec_1A_U11C-2T-A-9, T-A-10, T-A-11, T-A-2, T-A-3, T-A-6, T-A-7M-4, M-3S-2, S-3

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_C16_K01
The student acquires the ability to use the methods in the analysis and planning in the enterprise
Ec_1A_K01, Ec_1A_K02C-1, C-2T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-6M-1, M-4, M-3S-1, S-2

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C16_W01
The student has knowledge about methods supporting the process of making managerial decisions
2,0Student doesn't have basic knowledge about methods supporting management decision making. He obtained less than 60% of points from the test
3,0Student has a basic knowledge of methods supporting management decision making. He obtained 60-67% of points from the test.
3,5Student has a basic knowledge of the methods supporting management decision making and partly wrongly chooses the method depending on the circumstances. He obtained 68-75% of points from the test
4,0Student has good knowledge about methods supporting management decision making. He obtained 76-83% of points from the test
4,5Student has a very good knowledge of methods supporting management decision making processes and is able to choose the right method depending on the circumstances. He obtained 84-91% of points from the test
5,0Student has excellent knowledge of methods supporting managerial decision-making processes and can faultlessly choose the right method depending on the circumstances. He obtained at least 92% of points from the test
Ec_1A_C16_W02
Student is able to characterize the assumptions of methods supporting the decision-making process
2,0Student he cann't characterize assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process. He obtained less than 60% of points from the test
3,0Student is able to characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process to a sufficient extent. He obtained 60-67% of points from the test.
3,5Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process to a degree more than sufficient. He obtained 68-75% of points from the test
4,0Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process in a good degree. He obtained 76-83% of points from the test
4,5Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process to a degree more than good. He obtained 84-91% of points from the test
5,0Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process to a very good degree. He obtained at least 92% of points from the test

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C16_U01
The student analyzes the causes of the course of economic phenomena and their impact on the decisions made
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree
Ec_1A_C16_U02
The student has the ability to use theoretical knowledge in the decision making process
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree
Ec_1A_C16_U03
The student has the ability to select and use the appropriate method depending on the situation
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C16_K01
The student acquires the ability to use the methods in the analysis and planning in the enterprise
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree

Literatura podstawowa

  1. T. Ichiischi, A. Neyman, Y. Tauman, Game Theory and Applications, Academic Press, Inc., London, New York, Boston, Sydney, San Diego, Tokyo, 2014, https://books.google.pl/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JD2jBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=game+theory+and+applications+in+economic&ots=JqrC39CM-N&sig=IkzneXI_omuAbQ1V6OMQEktdpnI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=game%20theory%20and%20applications%20in%20economic&f=false
  2. Lau R.R., Models of Decision-Making, Oxford University Press, 2003, http://www.uky.edu/AS/PoliSci/Peffley/pdf/Lau.%20Models%20of%20Decision-Making.pdf
  3. Fang Z., Liu S., Shi H., Lin Y., Grey Game Theory and Its Applications in Econimic Decision_Making, Auerbach Publications, New York, 2016, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781420087406/grey-game-theory-applications-economic-decision-making-zhigeng-fang-sifeng-liu-hongxing-shi-yi-lin

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Karmowska G., Marciniak M., Evaluation of innovation economies of the Central and Eastern Europe compared to other EU countries., Quantitative Methods in Economic Research, Warszawa, 2017, Z 1, T 18, s. 48-57
  2. Hiller F.S., Liberman J.S., Introduction to Operations Research, Mc Graw-Hill International Edition, 2009

Treści programowe - ćwiczenia audytoryjne

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-A-1Basic principles of analysis and planning. Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk.2
T-A-2Decision making under uncertainty2
T-A-3Decision making under risk2
T-A-4Written test2
T-A-5Network Programming - problem solving CPM methods.2
T-A-6PERT methods2
T-A-7Time and cost analysis2
T-A-8Written test2
T-A-9Inventory models2
T-A-10Queuing systems2
T-A-11Models of renewal2
T-A-12Written test2
T-A-13AHP method1
25

Treści programowe - wykłady

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-W-1Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk2
T-W-2Solving problems with the use of network programming4
T-W-3Analytical models of queuing systems2
T-W-4Analysis of inventory problems2
T-W-5Transport problem2
T-W-6Methods of multi-criteria planning3
15

Formy aktywności - ćwiczenia audytoryjne

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-A-1Preparing for exercises10
A-A-2Preparing for the test of exercises15
A-A-3Participation in classes25
50
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-W-1Participation in lectures15
A-W-2Getting to know the literature of the subject4
A-W-3Preparing to pass a written4
A-W-4Exam2
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C16_W01The student has knowledge about methods supporting the process of making managerial decisions
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W07He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the issues in the field of quantitative methods (including mathematics, statistics, econometrics and decision-making theory) and examples of their applications in economic practice
Ec_1A_W12He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the methods of economic and financial analysis and planning
Cel przedmiotuC-1Familiarize students with the methods of supporting decision-making processes and the ability to use them
Treści programoweT-W-1Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk
T-W-2Solving problems with the use of network programming
T-W-3Analytical models of queuing systems
T-W-4Analysis of inventory problems
T-W-5Transport problem
T-W-6Methods of multi-criteria planning
Metody nauczaniaM-1Method of giving / Information lecture
M-2Method problem / Problem lecture
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from lectures in the form of test
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student doesn't have basic knowledge about methods supporting management decision making. He obtained less than 60% of points from the test
3,0Student has a basic knowledge of methods supporting management decision making. He obtained 60-67% of points from the test.
3,5Student has a basic knowledge of the methods supporting management decision making and partly wrongly chooses the method depending on the circumstances. He obtained 68-75% of points from the test
4,0Student has good knowledge about methods supporting management decision making. He obtained 76-83% of points from the test
4,5Student has a very good knowledge of methods supporting management decision making processes and is able to choose the right method depending on the circumstances. He obtained 84-91% of points from the test
5,0Student has excellent knowledge of methods supporting managerial decision-making processes and can faultlessly choose the right method depending on the circumstances. He obtained at least 92% of points from the test
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C16_W02Student is able to characterize the assumptions of methods supporting the decision-making process
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W01He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the issues in the field of economics and finance, their place in the social sciences system and connections with other scientific disciplines
Ec_1A_W06He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the methods and tools (including IT) of obtaining, processing and presenting data on socio-economic phenomena and processes
Cel przedmiotuC-1Familiarize students with the methods of supporting decision-making processes and the ability to use them
Treści programoweT-W-1Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk
T-W-2Solving problems with the use of network programming
T-W-3Analytical models of queuing systems
T-W-4Analysis of inventory problems
T-W-5Transport problem
Metody nauczaniaM-1Method of giving / Information lecture
M-2Method problem / Problem lecture
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from lectures in the form of test
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Student he cann't characterize assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process. He obtained less than 60% of points from the test
3,0Student is able to characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process to a sufficient extent. He obtained 60-67% of points from the test.
3,5Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process to a degree more than sufficient. He obtained 68-75% of points from the test
4,0Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process in a good degree. He obtained 76-83% of points from the test
4,5Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision making process to a degree more than good. He obtained 84-91% of points from the test
5,0Student can characterize the assumptions for methods supporting the decision-making process to a very good degree. He obtained at least 92% of points from the test
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C16_U01The student analyzes the causes of the course of economic phenomena and their impact on the decisions made
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U08He / she can properly analyse the causes and the course of social processes and phenomena in the field of economics and finance
Cel przedmiotuC-2Shaping the ability to choose a particular analysis method depending on the conditions
Treści programoweT-A-9Inventory models
T-A-10Queuing systems
T-A-11Models of renewal
T-A-2Decision making under uncertainty
T-A-3Decision making under risk
T-A-6PERT methods
T-A-7Time and cost analysis
Metody nauczaniaM-4Practical method / Auditory exercises
M-3Activation method / Case method
Sposób ocenyS-2Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from practice: tasks to be solved
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C16_U02The student has the ability to use theoretical knowledge in the decision making process
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U02He / she can apply the possessed theoretical knowledge, properly selecting data, methods and tools, to formulate and solve unusual and complex problems related to socio-economic processes and phenomena, and to solve tasks in conditions that are not fully predictable
Cel przedmiotuC-2Shaping the ability to choose a particular analysis method depending on the conditions
Treści programoweT-A-9Inventory models
T-A-10Queuing systems
T-A-11Models of renewal
T-A-2Decision making under uncertainty
T-A-3Decision making under risk
T-A-6PERT methods
T-A-7Time and cost analysis
Metody nauczaniaM-4Practical method / Auditory exercises
M-3Activation method / Case method
Sposób ocenyS-2Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from practice: tasks to be solved
S-3Ocena formująca: Rating activity participation in student activities, involving the preparation of a topic discussed in class
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C16_U03The student has the ability to select and use the appropriate method depending on the situation
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U04He / she can identify market structures and select basic tools and methods of their analysis
Ec_1A_U11He / she can analyse the indicated solutions to specific problems and propose appropriate solutions in this regard
Cel przedmiotuC-2Shaping the ability to choose a particular analysis method depending on the conditions
Treści programoweT-A-9Inventory models
T-A-10Queuing systems
T-A-11Models of renewal
T-A-2Decision making under uncertainty
T-A-3Decision making under risk
T-A-6PERT methods
T-A-7Time and cost analysis
Metody nauczaniaM-4Practical method / Auditory exercises
M-3Activation method / Case method
Sposób ocenyS-2Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from practice: tasks to be solved
S-3Ocena formująca: Rating activity participation in student activities, involving the preparation of a topic discussed in class
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C16_K01The student acquires the ability to use the methods in the analysis and planning in the enterprise
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_K01He / she is ready to define priorities for the implementation of tasks set by himself / herself or others
Ec_1A_K02He / she is ready to correctly identify and resolve dilemmas related to the profession
Cel przedmiotuC-1Familiarize students with the methods of supporting decision-making processes and the ability to use them
C-2Shaping the ability to choose a particular analysis method depending on the conditions
Treści programoweT-W-1Analysis of decision-making under uncertainty and risk
T-W-2Solving problems with the use of network programming
T-W-3Analytical models of queuing systems
T-W-4Analysis of inventory problems
T-W-6Methods of multi-criteria planning
Metody nauczaniaM-1Method of giving / Information lecture
M-4Practical method / Auditory exercises
M-3Activation method / Case method
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from lectures in the form of test
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Written exam from practice: tasks to be solved
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student doesn't think in an entrepreneurial way
3,0The student thinks and acts in an entrepreneurial way to a sufficient degree
3,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than enough
4,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a good degree
4,5The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a degree more than good
5,0The student thinks and works in an entrepreneurial way to a very good degree