Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Technologii i Inżynierii Chemicznej - Inżynieria chemiczna (S3)

Sylabus przedmiotu Progress in PhD work (PhD seminar) VIII:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Inżynieria chemiczna
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom trzeciego stopnia
Stopnień naukowy absolwenta doktor
Obszary studiów studia trzeciego stopnia
Profil
Moduł
Przedmiot Progress in PhD work (PhD seminar) VIII
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Instytut Inżynierii Chemicznej i Procesów Ochrony Środowiska
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Joanna Karcz <Joanna.Karcz@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele Walerian Arabczyk <Walerian.Arabczyk@zut.edu.pl>, Ryszard Kaleńczuk <Ryszard.Kalenczuk@zut.edu.pl>, Antoni Morawski <Antoni.Morawski@zut.edu.pl>, Urszula Narkiewicz <Urszula.Narkiewicz@zut.edu.pl>, Tadeusz Spychaj <Tadeusz.Spychaj@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane) 1,0 ECTS (formy) 1,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język angielski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
seminariaS8 10 1,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Knowledge of the content of the 2nd level courses: chemical technology or chemical engineering
W-2Knowledge of the content of the course „Progress in PhD work (PhD seminar)” presented during semesters 1-7.

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
seminaria
T-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.10
10

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
seminaria
A-S-1Participation in seminars.15
A-S-2Preparation of a presentation related to the complete results of investigations realized during the PhD work8
A-S-3Preparation for discussion in the area of the content presented in the seminar programme.7
30

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Practical methods: seminar.

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
ChE_3-_D17_W01
PhD student possesses specialized knowledge in the research area directly related the subject of the PhD work
ChE_3-_W07C-1, C-2T-S-1M-1S-1, S-2
ChE_3-_D17_W02
PhD student possesses knowledge about new solutions in chemical technology and engineering related to the selected research direction.
ChE_3-_W07C-1, C-2T-S-1M-1S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
ChE_3-_D17_U01
PhD student can utilize various research methods to solve issues being the subject of the PhD work.
ChE_3-_U03C-1, C-2T-S-1M-1S-1, S-2
ChE_3-_D17_U02
PhD student can evaluate the usability and possibility of utilization of novel solutions and methods in the area of the selected research direction.
ChE_3-_U03C-1, C-2T-S-1M-1S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
ChE_3-_D17_K01
PhD student can think and act in a creative manner in the area of essential research realized in the PhD work
ChE_3-_K02C-1, C-2T-S-1M-1S-1, S-2
ChE_3-_D17_K02
PhD student possesses competences necessary to evaluate the role of a researcher in the scientific and professional environments
ChE_3-_K02C-1, C-2T-S-1M-1S-1, S-2

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
ChE_3-_D17_W01
PhD student possesses specialized knowledge in the research area directly related the subject of the PhD work
2,0
3,0PhD student is able to explain on a basis level the research results obtained in the PhD work
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
ChE_3-_D17_W02
PhD student possesses knowledge about new solutions in chemical technology and engineering related to the selected research direction.
2,0
3,0PhD student can summarize on a basis level the knowledge about scientific news in the area of selected research direction
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
ChE_3-_D17_U01
PhD student can utilize various research methods to solve issues being the subject of the PhD work.
2,0
3,0PhD student can interpret on a basis level the research results obtained in the PhD work
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
ChE_3-_D17_U02
PhD student can evaluate the usability and possibility of utilization of novel solutions and methods in the area of the selected research direction.
2,0
3,0PhD student can evaluate on a basis level the usability and possibility of utilization of novel solutions and methods in the area of the selected research direction
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
ChE_3-_D17_K01
PhD student can think and act in a creative manner in the area of essential research realized in the PhD work
2,0
3,0PhD student can on a basis level think and act in a creative manner in the area of the essential research realized in the PhD work
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
ChE_3-_D17_K02
PhD student possesses competences necessary to evaluate the role of a researcher in the scientific and professional environments
2,0
3,0PhD student presents his/her concern for the reputation of a researcher in the scientific environment.
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Bird R.B., Stewart W.E., Lightfoot E.N., Transport Phenomena, Wiley, New York, 2007
  2. Cheremisinoff N.P., Handbook of Chemical Processing Equipment, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 2000
  3. Raghavendra N.V., Krishnamurthy L., Engineering Metrology and Measurements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013
  4. Brandt S., Data Analysis. Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers (3rd ed), Springer Verlag, New York, 1999
  5. Rice R.G., Do D.D., Applied mathematics and modeling for chemical engineers, Wiley, New York, 2012
  6. Hanges K.M., Cameron L.T., Process modelling and model analysis, Academic Press, San Diego, 2001
  7. Dobre T.G., Marcano J.G.S., Chemical Engineering. Modeling, Simulation and Similitude, Wiley, Weinheim, 2007
  8. Rao S.S., Applied Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1999

Treści programowe - seminaria

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.10
10

Formy aktywności - seminaria

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-S-1Participation in seminars.15
A-S-2Preparation of a presentation related to the complete results of investigations realized during the PhD work8
A-S-3Preparation for discussion in the area of the content presented in the seminar programme.7
30
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_D17_W01PhD student possesses specialized knowledge in the research area directly related the subject of the PhD work
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_W07She/he has knowledge about the directions of development and the most important novel achievements in technology and chemical engineering and related fields to the selected direction of research.
Cel przedmiotuC-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.
Treści programoweT-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Practical methods: seminar.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0PhD student is able to explain on a basis level the research results obtained in the PhD work
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_D17_W02PhD student possesses knowledge about new solutions in chemical technology and engineering related to the selected research direction.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_W07She/he has knowledge about the directions of development and the most important novel achievements in technology and chemical engineering and related fields to the selected direction of research.
Cel przedmiotuC-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.
Treści programoweT-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Practical methods: seminar.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0PhD student can summarize on a basis level the knowledge about scientific news in the area of selected research direction
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_D17_U01PhD student can utilize various research methods to solve issues being the subject of the PhD work.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_U03She/he is capable of using a variety of techniques in a transparent manner to communicate in a professional environment in English, and in other environments in English and in at least one foreign language from such as: Polish, French, German or Russian.
Cel przedmiotuC-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.
Treści programoweT-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Practical methods: seminar.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0PhD student can interpret on a basis level the research results obtained in the PhD work
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_D17_U02PhD student can evaluate the usability and possibility of utilization of novel solutions and methods in the area of the selected research direction.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_U03She/he is capable of using a variety of techniques in a transparent manner to communicate in a professional environment in English, and in other environments in English and in at least one foreign language from such as: Polish, French, German or Russian.
Cel przedmiotuC-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.
Treści programoweT-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Practical methods: seminar.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0PhD student can evaluate on a basis level the usability and possibility of utilization of novel solutions and methods in the area of the selected research direction
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_D17_K01PhD student can think and act in a creative manner in the area of essential research realized in the PhD work
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_K02She/he understands the need to inform the public by publishing popular scientific press, radio and television, opinions regarding modern solutions in the field of chemical and process engineering, omissions of obsolete technology; the need to provide information about the positive and negative aspects of the business related to chemical technology and chemical engineering.
Cel przedmiotuC-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.
Treści programoweT-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Practical methods: seminar.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0PhD student can on a basis level think and act in a creative manner in the area of the essential research realized in the PhD work
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_D17_K02PhD student possesses competences necessary to evaluate the role of a researcher in the scientific and professional environments
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_K02She/he understands the need to inform the public by publishing popular scientific press, radio and television, opinions regarding modern solutions in the field of chemical and process engineering, omissions of obsolete technology; the need to provide information about the positive and negative aspects of the business related to chemical technology and chemical engineering.
Cel przedmiotuC-1Formation of a PhD student’s ability to present the results of the essential investigations conducted during the PhD work realized in the area of chemical technology or chemical engineering disciplines.
C-2Formation of a PhD student’s ability to discuss on the results of the essential investigations realized during the PhD work.
Treści programoweT-S-1PhD students’ presentations of the results of the investigations realized during the PhD work. Discussion on the presentations between the seminar participants.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Practical methods: seminar.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment based on given presentation and activity in discussion during seminars.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Continuous assessment based of PhD student’s activity during seminars.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0PhD student presents his/her concern for the reputation of a researcher in the scientific environment.
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0